1998 Catalog of Practical Papers
VI. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, DESIGN, AND PERFORMANCE
Click on a paper number to view a brief summary:

980215 “An Engineering Application of Washington State’s Pavement Management System”
980235 “Project Scoping Using Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Testing - New Jersey Experience”
980465 “Potential Safety Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Rutted Pavements”
980467 “Comparison of Accident Experience Between Tinned and Continuously Ground Portland Cement Concrete Pavements”
980572 “Pavement Distress and Selection of Rehabilitation Alternatives: Michigan Practice”
980655 “A Pavement Preservation Strategy”
980685 “Effects of Spot Diamond Grinding on the Performance of PCC Pavements”
980988 “Contracting for Pavement Distress Data Collection”
981147 “Catalog Of Recommended Flexible Pavement Design Features”










980215 “An Engineering Application of Washington State’s Pavement Management System”

Abstract: Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Pavement Management System (WSPMS) investigations revealed pavement sections on the state route (SR) system that were outperforming or underperforming other pavement sections constructed of similar materials and subjected to similar traffic and environmental conditions. The WSPMS was used to identify superior and inferior candidate pavements for further investigation. All state route pavements were stratified into 18 distinct analysis groups and population statistics were generated for each group providing WSDOT with a snapshot of the current "state of the SR system" and providing the basis for selecting candidate pavements. The five performance measures considered included: age of the surface course, a distress-based pavement structural condition score (PSC), annual design-lane Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs), roughness (in terms of International Roughness Index-IRI), and rutting. Conclusions: Results of the analysis suggest that WSDOT is properly designing layer thicknesses at appropriate reliability levels. Also, in six of ten analysis group comparisons, inferior pavements were actually thicker than superior pavements. Both findings suggest that thickness design factors are not the primary cause of inferior performance in Washington State, rather construction, material and/or site specific factors are likely the cause. Additionally, in an international effort to exchange information, technology and ideas, highlights of a comparative study of pavement performance with South Africa's Gauteng Department of Transportation (Gautrans) are presented.
Michael J. Baker, David Evans and Associates, Inc., 2828 SW Corbett Avenue, Portland, OR 97201. Tel: (503) 223-6663 Fax: (503) 223-2701. e-mail:
mjba@deainc.com. Joe P. Mahoney, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, 121 More Hall, Seattle, WA 98195. Tel: (206) 685-1760 Fax: (206) 543-1543. e-mail: jmahoney@u.washington.edu. Nadarajah Sivaneswaran, Washington State Department of Transportation, Materials Laboratory, 1655 South 2nd Avenue, Tumwater, WA 98502. Tel: (360) 709-5475 Fax: (360) 709-5588. e-mail: sivanen@wsdot.wa.gov.

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

980235 “Project Scoping Using FWD (Falling Weight Deflectometer) Testing - New Jersey Experience”


Abstract: A network level FWD testing program was performed on a selected subset, approximately 530 centerline km (330 miles), of the National Highway Network (NHS) highways in New Jersey. The main goals of this program are to identify the limits of structurally homogeneous sections (sectionalization), assessing the pavement structural capacity, estimate the remaining service life and predict the future rehabilitation needs. The FWD measurements of each route were appended together to form a sort of continuous deflection profile and two sectionalization scenarios were considered to divide the deflection profiles into a set of homogeneous sections. In the first scenario, sectionalization is made based on section deflection, while in the second scenario, sectionalization is made with respect to the future rehabilitation needs. The first scenario was used in the analysis because unknown parameters, such as pavement structure and traffic, have no influence on the sectionalization results. Conclusions: The sectionalization step was found to be important and has significant impact on the rehabilitation results. If this step is omitted, a project will be treated as one analysis/design section. In this case, some parts of this project will be over designed, while other parts will be under designed. It is strongly recommended that accurate pavement structure data be used in FWD analysis, otherwise, the analysis results can be misleading. This accurate data can be obtained by destructive (such as cores and trenches) and/or non-destructive (such as Ground Penetrating Radar - GPR) methods.
Dr. Sameh Zaghloul, Dr. Wei He, Brian Kerr, ITX Stanley Ltd., 152 Main St., Cambridge, ON N1R 6R1, Canada. Tel : (519) 622-3005 Fax : (519) 622-2580. Nick Vitillo, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Bureau of Research, Trenton, NJ 08625-0600. Tel : (609) 530-5966 Fax : (609) 530-5972.

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

980465 “Potential Safety Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Rutted Pavements”


Abstract: Pavement rutting is a problem that has unknown consequences from a safety-based point of view. It is assumed that the wheel path fills with water in wet-weather situations, thus increasing the potential for a vehicle to hydroplane. The purpose of this study was to quantify how pavement rutting affects accident rates and to evaluate possible safety-based guidelines for the treatment of pavement rutting. Rut depth, traffic volume, and accident databases maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation for undivided rural highways were then analyzed to identify statistical trends and relationships. Accidents were categorized as rut-related if the prevailing conditions could be potentially associated with the occurrence of hydroplaning. Rut depth measurements were average values for both directions of 0.16 km (0.1 mi) segments, and represent the average elevation difference between the tire paths and the high point between them. Conclusions: The results of the statistical analyses indicated that the defined rut-related accident rate begins to increase at a significantly greater rate as rut depths exceed 7.6 mm (0.3 inches). The results are consistent with expectations in that increasing rates of rut-related accidents were observed as rut depth increased. The cost- effectiveness of potential accident reductions associated with reductions in the relative amount of rutted pavement was also evaluated.
Marc R. Start, Barton-Aschman Assoc., 300 W. Washington Street, Chicago IL 60606-1720. Tel: (312) 917-3090 Fax: (312) 917-1329. Jeong Kim, The Korea Transport Institute, Kangnam-gu, Daechi-dong 968-5, Seoul, 135-280, Korea. Tel: 82-2-538-3536 Fax: 82-2-564-1820. e-mail: j
hkim@cis.koti.re.kr William D Berg, 2206 Engineering Hall, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI 5370. Tel: (608) 262-7246 Fax: (608) 262-5199. e-mail: berg@engr.wisc.edu

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

980467 “Comparison of Accident Experience Between Tinned and Continuously Ground Portland Cement Concrete Pavements”


Abstract: Accident experience differences between Portland Cement Concrete Pavements (PCCP’s) that have been continuously ground during construction and standard PCCP’s with tinneed surfaces have not been well established. The study objective was to identify the existence and quantify the extent of accident characteristics differences between the two types of PCCP’s.Accident experience comparisons were performed between 290 km of continuously ground and 115 km of tinned PCCP’s in Wisconsin. Accident rates were calculated based on six years (1988-1993) of accident and vehicular travel information. Conclusions: Continuously ground pavements were found to outperform tinned pavements during daytime and nighttime, on dry and wet pavements and when snow and ice are present on the pavement; also for all combinations of those conditions. The only exception was for nighttime accidents when snow and ice are present on the pavement. Six-year accident rate trends were analyzed for different light and pavement conditions. Test site trends were consistently lower than the control site trends; however no clear upward or downward direction was evident for any of the analyzed trends. This paper is not included on the 1998 Preprint CD-ROM. Please contact author for information.
Aris Drakopoulos, Thomas H. Wenzel, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Marquette University, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201. Tel: (414) 288-5430 Fax: (414) 288-7521. e-mail:
drakopou@vms.csd.mu.edu. Stephen F. Shober, Robert B. Schmiedlin, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 3502 Kinsman Blvd., Madison, WI 53704-2507. Tel: (608) 246-5399 Fax: (608) 246-4669.

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

980572 “Pavement Distress and Selection of Rehabilitation Alternatives: Michigan Practice”


Abstract: The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) practices regarding the preservation, rehabilitation, and preventative maintenance actions for rigid, flexible, and composite pavements are presented and discussed. For each pavement type, the causes of distress, and the corresponding MDOT fix alternatives are also presented. Examples of the MDOT practice regarding the selection of maintenance and rehabilitation alternatives for rigid, flexible and composite pavements, are also presented. Conclusions: The proper pavement treatment options cannot be accurately selected unless the types and root causes of pavement distress are known and understood. The selection of the preferred alternative, on the other hand, is typically based on the optimization of the benefits to costs ratio of each of the selected alternatives. It is shown that, although the MDOT practice varies from one district to another, efforts are being made to unify the practice and to generate a computerized system to assist the engineers in the various districts. These efforts include the selection of the pavement fix alternative based on the optimization of the benefits and costs of the various fixes that are applicable to a project.
Donald C. Wotring, Gilbert Y. Baladi Ph.D, P.E., Neeraj Buch Ph.D., Pavement Research Center of Excellence, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 3546 Engineering Building, East Lansing, MI 48824. Tel: (517) 355 - 5147 Fax: (517) 432 - 1827. e-mail:
baladi@egr.msu.edu. Steve Bower P.E., Design Division, Michigan Department of Transportation, Transportation Bld., 425 W. Ottawa, Lansing, MI 48909. Tel: (517) 373 - 0551 Fax: (517) 335 - 2731

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

980655 “A Pavement Preservation Strategy”


Abstract:The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) established a Pavement Policy Committee in 1992. The ongoing goal of this committee is to provide pavements which are cost effective, maximize service life with minimal maintenance and meet the overall expectations of the traveling public with respect to comfort, convenience and safety. One of the principal issues this committee originally addressed was the establishment of a comprehensive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategy, which grew into Wisconsin’s Pavement Preservation Strategy (PPS), the subject of this report. Pavement preservation can be defined as a strategy for individual pavements and for optimizing the performance for a pavement network. The Pavement Preservation Philosophy is based upon infrastructure optimization. The goal is to provide the highest quality service possible to the customer per unit of expenditure. Wisconsin’s PPP is customer oriented. Each maintenance or rehabilitation venture must address the issues of primary importance to the customer: Comfort, Convenience, Safety, and Cost. Conclusions: The pavement evaluation process presented here provides a logical approach to progressing from field observations of distress to proposed treatment strategy. Treatment levels identified as “Low Cost”, “Best Value”, and “Longest Life” are established based on manipulation of cost and expected life data for each treatment on the short list of viable options.
Steve F. Shober. Dave A. Friedrichs. Wisconsin DOT, 3502 Kinsman Blvd., Madison, WI 53704. Tel: (608) 246-5399 Fax: (608) 246-4669.

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

980685 “Effects of Spot Diamond Grinding on the Performance of PCC Pavements”


Abstract: A study was initiated by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation to investigate the effects of spot diamond grinding on the performance and material properties of concrete pavement. A field survey was conducted to assess the conditions of selected spot diamond ground PCC (portland cement concrete) pavement sites. Pavement distress data was collected on control and spot ground sections on 22 different highways and 34 different locations in Wisconsin. In addition, micro-surveys were completed for each of the spot ground sections. Utilizing the PDI (pavement distress index) values and results of the micro-surveys comparisons are made between sections that were spot ground and those that were not. Conclusions: The PDI and micro-survey results were consistent, indicating the mean values of the ground and control sections were statistically significantly different, but of no practical difference. However, although statistically significantly different, according to the confidence interval, the spot diamond ground and control sites were very similar indicating that, for all practical purposes, spot diamond grinding does not adversely affect the performance and material properties of the pavement. Therefore, it can be concluded that there was no observed relationship between the PDI values and the extent (percent of grinding) of surface grinding.
Dr. Thomas H. Wenzel, Chairman and Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Marquette University, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881 Tel: (414) 288-7030 Fax: (414) 288-7521. e-mail:
wenzel@marquette.edu. Fariborz Vazir Abadi, P.E. Manager, Traffic Engineering Section, Milwaukee County Public Works Department, Milwaukee, WI. Tel: (414) 278-5247 Fax: (414) 223-1850. e-mail: vazir-abad@worldnet.att.net. Stephen F. Shober, P.E. Chief Pavement and Research Engineer, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 3502 W. Kinsman Boulevard, Madison, WI 53704-2507. Tel: (608) 246-5399 Fax: (608) 246-4669. e-mail: sshober@mail.state.wi.us. Robert Schmiedlin, P.E., Research Supervisor, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 3502 W. Kinsman Boulevard, Madison, WI Tel: (608) 246-7950 Fax: (608) 246-4669. e-mail: rschmie.1@mail.state.wi.us.

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

980988 “Contracting for Pavement Distress Data Collection”


Abstract: Many agencies responsible for managing pavements have adopted pavement management systems (PMS) to help manage their pavement networks more cost-effectively. One of the most costly parts of operating a PMS is collecting condition information, especially pavement distress information. Many agencies have started to contract for pavement distress data collection. Some of the agencies have experienced problems with the data collected by contract. This paper briefly describes a study for agencies in Washington and Oregon to define the accuracy of data needed by the agencies with an evaluation of certain participating vendors using semi-automated data collection methods. It also raises issues about quality control and quality assurance faced by agencies considering contracting for automated data collection. Conclusions: These issues need additional study to develop appropriate guidelines. The initial set provided here are based on discussions with some of the agencies currently contracting for pavement distress data collection. Several agencies are contracting for pavement distress data collection, and it appears that the amount of contracted data collection is increasing. The agencies contracting for pavement distress data collection need to establish the accuracy, precision, and resolution of the data needed. They need to develop quality assurance requirements for the data collection contracts. The study conducted in Washington and Oregon provides one method of defining the accuracy needed based on condition indexes. It also demonstrated that some vendors using automated, or semi-automated, methods can collect data that will provide condition indexes as accurate as those from manual surveys.
Roger E. Smith, PE, Ph.D., Thomas J. Freeman, PE, Olga J. Pendleton, Ph.D., Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843. Tel: (409) 845-0875 Fax: (409) 845-0278

Back to Subject Index.-----Back to Top.

981147 “Catalog Of Recommended Flexible Pavement Design Features”


Abstract: Many European countries have developed and implemented pavement design catalogs for many years. These catalogs, for which pavement design features have been organized in a usable type format, have evolved over time and represent the experience from a large, diverse and knowledgeable group of industry representatives. Even though extensive experience and knowledge exist in the U.S., similar type catalogs have simply not evolved here. Stated simply, the objective of the catalog design process is to identify pavement structures that provide acceptable performance and economy over the intended design life, for a given combination of roadbed soil conditions, climate, and traffic loadings. Conclusions: This paper provides an overview of the catalog of "good practice" recommendations for design features of flexible highway pavements that was developed under NCHRP Project 1-32 (1, 2). It also summarizes the process that was used to obtain consensus from a diverse group of individuals with extensive knowledge in pavement design and construction across the U.S. Based on the European experience, however, improvement of these types of catalogs is a very dynamic process, requiring multiple upgrades and enhancements with time and experience. Thus, it is strongly recommended that the design catalog be critically reviewed on some periodic basis to facilitate its use and adoption by the industry as a whole.
Harold L. Von Quintus, Brian M. Killingsworth. Brent Rauhut Engineering Inc., 8240 Mopac, Suite 220, Austin, TX 78759. Tel: (512) 346-0870. Michael I. Darter, Emmanuel Owusu-Antwi, Jane Jiang. ERES Consultants Inc., 505 West University Avenue, Champaign, IL 61820. Tel: (217) 356-4500


Back to Subject Index. | Back to Top.