{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":2,"sheets":["Roadmap ideas","Validation lists"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Roadmap ideas","index":0,"n_rows":41,"n_cols":10,"rows_kept":41,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Idea Identification #","Idea Rank (1 = highest)","Overarching Industry and FAA Objectives ","High Level Theme","Subtopic","Research Idea: Working Title","Idea Background","Research Objective","Related Research","ACRP IdeaHub Tags"]
[21,1,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","Modernizing and Retrofitting Airport Buildings","Best Practice Guidance on Modernizing Existing Aging Facilities with Limited Budgets","Guidance to develop a set of strategies and practices to update aging airport facilities, how to select and implement the lowest cost - highest impact initiatives for the facility. Airports are budget constrained without the ability to increase the PFC, and with AIP funds stagnating. The reality is that many facilities need updates and  not all airports have the budgets to rebuild or undertake extensive renovations. What are the greatest \"bang for the buck\" measures an airport can take to update facilities on a tight budget? ","Objective is to develop guidance and best practices for how to identify the most appropriate updates to aging airport facilities, including guidance on selecting and implementing the least cost - highest impact initiatives for airports. The guidance should be broad and sufficiently flexible to help airports select the most important criteria for their unique facilities.",null,"Airport Planning, Construction, Design , Finance-Economics, IT, Sustainability, Terminal"]
[7,2,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Accommodating Changing Demographics","Designing Airport Facilities for an Aging Population","The number of Americans aged 65 and older is expected to double from 46 million today to over 98 million by 2060. As a result the design for aging air passengers continues to be discussed throughout the industry as airports and airlines grapple with the best way to accommodate these passengers, while providing an acceptable level of customer service.  Wheelchair queues in passenger boarding bridges continue to get longer while narrowing the throat that ambulatory passengers use and potentially invalidating legal emergency exiting requirements from an aircraft.  Large hub terminals continue to expand and become more expansive, further increasing the distance of travel from curbside to aircraft door.  Concourse  walkways are becoming more crowded with passengers, moving walkways and personal transportation devices all vying for the same pedestrian space.  Research is needed to develop airport-specific design guidelines, good practices to serve this demographic as well as understand the concessions/customer service preferences of this demographic.","Objective is to develop airport-specific design guidelines and best practices for serving an aging American demographic as well as understanding the concessions/customer service preferences of this demographic.","ACRP Synthesis Report 51: Impacts of Aging Travelers on Airports (2014)","Airport Planning, Construction, Customer Experience, Design, Terminal, Public Relations, Public Safety "]
[1,3,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Accommodating Changing Demographics","Restroom and Facility Design to Accommodate Travelers of All Abilities, Ages, Genders and Gender Identity","The debate and shifting public opinion regarding issues of inclusivity for all people has resulted in a new way to look at public restroom facilities. Airport designers can take a new approach to designing restrooms that provide a non-discriminatory way for people who may not identify with their outward gender appearances to use facilities of their choosing. Airport toilet facilities have typically been constructed based on \"birth\" sexual identification.  Because of this, and because of the sensitivity and public debate surrounding very personal orientation issue, airports are having a difficult time trying to determine how to provide the inclusivity desired with the facilities that they have already constructed.  Research could provide airports with the guidance to provide this type of passenger service for all passenger orientations, families, ages, abilities, etc. with the facilities that they currently have or in the design of new buildings. ACRP Report 130 (2015) addresses some of these issues at a very high level, and provides an overview of notional \"universal\" restroom design. A a subsequent research project could build off of this report.","To develop a comprehensive guidebook for airport designers, planners and consultants on best practices for restroom design to accomodate all traveling demographics. The guidebook should include information on how to design restrooms and ancillary facilities (such as changing rooms, showers, etc) taking into account passengers of various ages, abilities, genders and gender identity, and families. ","ACRP Report 130: Guidebook for Airport Terminal Restroom Planning & Design\n\n\nCurrent ACRP project on restrooms and ancillary designs for svcs like pet relief areas, showers, meditation rooms ","Construction, Customer Experience, Design, Terminal, Public Relations, Airport Planning, "]
[22,4,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","Alternative Approaches to Project Delivery Mechanisms","Alternative FAA Funding Mechanisms for Grants: Beyond Design-Bid-Build","Some airports have utilized alternative project delivery methods for AIP funded projects, however others have been constrained in project delivery mechanisms other than the standard delivery model (Design-Bid-Build) based on real or perceived preferences of the FAA Airport District Offices. Research is needed to compile case studies where airports have received grants for projects with alternative delivery methods. This would educate airports, consultants,  and regulators about successful alternative delivery models that have worked around the country and which have met  all applicable regulatory requirements.","Objective is to develop a synthesis of case studies in which airports have completed projects funded through FAA AIP grants that successfully utilize alternative delivery methods while meeting regulatory requirements. ","49 U.S.C §47142 establishes design-build contracting as an approvable form of project delivery under AIP. Under the statute, design-build contracting is defined as an agreement that provides for both design and construction of a project by a single contractor. That contractor holds responsibility for the entire contract. Design-build may provide cost savings because of time savings in the contracting process as well as earlier start of construction.  Before undertaking alternative project delivery for an AIP funded project, the conditions for the project must be evaluated to determine if alternative delivery is more beneficial than the traditional design-bid-build method. Sponsors should follow all applicable State and local laws\nbut must include the required Federal contract clauses and provisions in the procurement documents. See Title 2 CFR § 200.326. ","Administration, Airport Planning, Airside, Finance-Economics, Legal, Policy"]
[23,5,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","Alternative Approaches to Project Delivery Mechanisms","Alternative Delivery Methods – Replacing Design, Bid, and Build","Design-bid-build is a traditional project delivery mechanism in use in the airport industry, but interest is growing in project delivery models, such as design-build and construction manager at risk. According to ACC's 2017 \"Development Trends at U.S. Airports : A Summary look at Future Trends and Opportunities\", design-bid-build are still very common for smaller or less complicated projects, but for larger \" and more complex projects, airports are increasingly using Design-Build (DB) and Construction Manager at Risk (CM at Risk) to expedite schedules, reduce the risk to the airport, and to provide a better project at a lower cost\". \n\nProgressive-Design-Build (PDB) is another alternative to design-build, whereby the process is progressive, or occurs in stages. the PDB uses a qualifications based selection, which is then followed by a progressive design and construction process. Usually, a design-build firm is selected based on qualifications by the project owner, before the project design is developed. This is followed by an iterative design and budgeting process and negotiation of contract price. This is followed by final design, build, and commissioning. Some states have restrictions on these type of project delivery mechanisms, and the alternative approaches are still relatively new to the airport industry. Research would examine this process and identify both airport and related non-airport project case studies and best practices, pros and cons, and how airports can determine whether this method is appropriate for their project.  \n\nResearch would provide a primer on these alternative methods, how to select the most appropriate model for your airport project, pros and cons to each and successful case studies.","Objective is to develop a primer on alternative project delivery methods including Design-Build (DB), Construction Manager at Risk (CM at Risk), and Progressive-Design-Build (PDB) including guidance on strategies for selecting most appropriate method based on project needs, laying out pros/cons, and presenting successful case studies. ","similar to 33-Design \"Progressive Design Build – Airport Examples and Applications\"","Administration, Construction, Design, Finance-Economics, Policy"]
[18,6,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies","Curbside, Roadways, Vehicles","Integrating TNCs into Ground Transportation Infrastructure","Transportation Network Companies, or TNCs have revolutionized ground transportation options for passengers traveling to and from airports. Airports have worked at the local level to integrate these services into the airport environment and ensure some cost and regulatory parity with other ground transportation service providers such as taxis. However research is needed to build off of Synthesis 84 to develop design guidelines and best practices for incorporating TNCs into ground transportation infrastructure,  in addition to how airports can develop TNC user agreements and fee structures.  ","Objective is to develop design guidelines and best practices for incorporating TNCs into ground transportation infrastructure, including TNC user agreements and fee structures to properly monetize airport infrastructure. ","ACRP Synthesis 84: Transportation Network Companies: Challenges and Opportunities for Airport Operators ","Airport Planning, Construction, Customer Experience, Design, Finance-Economics, IT, Sustainability"]
[31,6,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Safety and Security","Innovative Approaches to Security / TSA Operations","Passive Screening as a Pre-Checkpoint Risk Based Screening Tool","Airports continue to be an enticing target for individuals and organizations intent on doing harm to a large amount of people is a very short time.  While airports have secured the airside of the terminal the landside portion of the terminal continues to provide a target-rich environment for those intending to do harm.  Recently, Zavantem International Airport (Brussels), Istanbul Ataturk International Airport (Turkey), and Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (US) have experienced attacks on the landside / non-secure side of the airport terminal.  Many are quick to call for the securing of the now non-secure landside portion of the terminal.  However, this short-sighted call really does not alleviate the target of these \"terrorists\".  The target is people.  Moving the security to the front of the terminal only relocates the security queue to the front of the building, again creating an unprotected target.  How can airports, today, begin to utilize active and passive security systems, even prior to entering the facility, to identify potential security risks and further protect the general public from harm prior to entering the secure side of the airport facility?","Objective is to determine how airports can utilize active and passive security screening systems as a pre-checkpoint tool to identify security risks prior to entering the secured portion of the airport facility in order to protect the general public from harm as a result of terrorism. ",null,"Design, Landisde,Public Safety, Safety, Security, Terminal"]
[38,6,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Workforce Development","General Guidance / Implementation Tools","Guidebook on Professional Development and Retention: How to Retain Great Employees","Attrition, workforce development, and growing the next generation of airport leaders is a critical issue for airports of all sizes and all departments within airports.  Along with many other professions, the number of airport employees who are baby boomers and eligible to retire in the near future is significant. In addition, the pace of technological change is exponential and airports rely more than ever on advanced digital technologies. Guidance is needed to attract, retain, and train new and existing employees in the airport industry in design and construction","Objective is to develop a guidebook on professional development and retention, including strategies for airports to attract, retain, and train new and existing employees in in airport design and construction fields.  the research can build off of prior ACRP guidance on this topic.","ACRP) Report 18: Aviation Workforce Development Practices (2009)\n\nACRP Report 75: Airport Leadership Development Program (2012)","Administration, Human Resources, Policy, Sustainability, Workforce"]
[20,9,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","Alternative Approaches to Project Delivery Mechanisms","Guidebook on Project Delivery and Construction: How to Successfully Deliver Construction Projects","There is significant interest in the airport community regarding new and evolving project delivery methods, but there lacks a guidebook on construction project delivery methods and contracting issues for airport staff, particularly small and GA airports. FAA resources on overall construction management are limited and the joint ACC/FAA best practices guide dates back to 2008. ","Objective is to develop a guidebook on  how to select the most appropriate construction project delivery methods for airports, with a particular focus on small and GA airport.  The research should contain educational materials on contract negotiations as well.","ACRP Report 21: A Guidebook for Selecting Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods (2009); ","Administration, Airport-Planning, Construction, Design, Finance-Economics, Workforce"]
[13,10,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies","Modernizing and Retrofitting Airport Buildings","Plug-n-Play: Integrating new technology into older infrastructure systems ","Terminal buildings and airport facilities are built to last decades, whereas the pace of technological change is exponential. Airports need to keep pace with new technologies and software, but this is difficult with aging systems and facilities. Research is needed on how to integrate new technologies into both old facilities and legacy software programs, as well as planning for technology integration into new projects. This is a multidisciplinary topic that involves airport planners, finance, IT, designers and contractors.   ","The research objective is to identify strategies for integrating new technologies into existing facilities and seemingly incompatible software programs through a guidebook and case studies.","ACRP Report 59: Information Technology Systems at Airports--A Primer (2012)","Airport Planning, Construction, Customer Experience, Design, IT, Operations"]
[4,11,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Customer Service","Passenger Experience","Accommodating Families in Crises – Preparing Passenger and Family Staging Areas","Airports deal with a variety of safety and security events such as accidents, terrorism, active shooter events, etc. They also serve as staging areas for disaster response. ACRP has conducted research on crisis and emergency communication and family assistance programs, but additional research is needed to develop guidelines, best practices and case studies on how to design and implement passenger and family staging areas/spaces in these cases. Creating designated staging areas serve to provide a central location for passengers and families while waiting to receive services or news of loved ones, or for the crisis to be resolved.  These areas should be out of the public areas of the terminal which minimizes disruption to recovery efforts and/or normal airport operations. and limits access to press for example.","Objective is to develop design guidelines, best practices and case studies on designing passenger and family staging areas in the event of a safety or security event or disaster. ","ACRP Research Report 171: Establishing a Coordinated Local Family Assistance Program for Airports  (2017)\n\nACRP Synthesis 60 - Airport Post Emergency Recovery Practices (2015) \n\nACRP Synthesis 82: Uses of Social Media to Inform Operational Response and Recovery During an Airport Emergency (2017)\n\nACRP Synthesis 73: Emergency Communications Planning for Airports (2016)\n\nFAA AC 150/5200-31C (2010)","Airport Planning, Construction, Customer Experience, Design, Emergency Management, Terminal, Public Relations, Safety "]
[25,11,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","Alternative Approaches to Project Delivery Mechanisms","Determining the Best Financing Approach for Your Project: P3s vs. Municipal Bonds and other Options","In the face of steady AIP funding despite increasing costs for airport design and construction projects, and with Congress' failure to raise the Passenger Facility Charge cap, airports have to consider alternative financing options for their capital projects. Public-Private partnerships have been of great interest to the airport industry for several years, but there has only been one successful airport-wide P3 arrangement to date, in San Juan PR.  More frequently, P3s projects at airports are on a facility level, for example a terminal, parking garage, or CONRAC. As airports investigate financing options for their projects when AIP funds don't cover the bill, or not appropriate.","Objective is to develop guidance for airports considering alternative financing options for their capital projects, including Public-Private Partnerships (P3s) and other options. ","ACRP Report 21: A Guidebook for Selecting Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods (2009); \n\n\nReport 49:  Collaborative Airport Capital Planning Handbook.","Administration, Airport Planning, Construction, Design, Finance-Economics, Policy"]
[27,13,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Safety and Security","Integrating Technology, Data","Data Security for Airport Building Information Management Systems ","One big thing for facilities and maintenance and for BIM to be valuable (achieve intended benefits (i.e., ROI on investment, High level of equipment availability (Higher Mean Time Between Failure and Lower Mean Time to Repair/Restore), Continuity of Operations, etc.,) is to push the data out to tablets, phones, devices in the field.  The system needs two-way data exchange to be valuable and used to maximum potential. However, this raises data security issues. The challenge is how do airports satisfy data security requirements across stakeholder file servers and systems?  \n\nCloud Computing provides a common “file server” that multiple stakeholders can operate a shared application off of, however airports are restricted from using cloud-based applications that do not satisfy GSA data security requirements.  Many commercial BIM, GIS, etc., cloud-based application service providers do not satisfy the GSA data security requirements.  Research is needed to address this issue and guide airports on how to secure data for these applications.","Objective is to address the issue of data security for airport Building Information Management (BIM) systems and provide guidance on strategies for securing data across applications while satisfying GSA data security requirements.",null,"Construction, Design, IT, Security"]
[14,14,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies","Sustainable Design","Smart Buildings: Performance Monitoring Systems and Centralizing Dashboards for Building Health and Resiliency \n","Research is needed to understand technology solutions for automatizing building systems and integrating with both new and various existing IT systems and software programs at airports.  The benefits of building automation is well understood from a  energy efficiency and building comfort standpoint, however airports often find themselves with limited options depending on what hardware is in place. Research to help airports employ open-ended systems that can integrate with non-branded software with hardware for building automation would be helpful.  The research would identify technologies that airport designers and builders can consider incorporating at the front end of projects to ensure optimal system and component connectivity in future years, as well considerations to ensure facilities can be easily be updated later.","The objective is to identify technology solutions for automatizing building systems and best practices for integrating these solutions into both new and existing IT systems and software programs at airports. ",null,"Construction, Design, IT, Sustainability, Terminal"]
[8,15,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Passenger Experience","Defining, Measuring and Designing for the Passenger Experience","Currently there is a focus in the airport and airline industry on providing exceptional passenger experience. As aviation is a global industry, passenger experience is measured at airports all over the world and airports are compared to their peers internationally. Thus U.S. airports are often measured against airports in other parts of the world, particularly the Middle East and Asia, where airports are being built new (i.e. greenfield environments).  Dwell time is significantly different in these new airports than their decades-old counterparts in the US, and the comparison is not necessarily as meaningful as a result.  In addition to  these differences, a variety of air carrier players from low-cost carriers to legacy carriers serve a spectrum of passengers, from basic economy to first class. These various factors require a flexible approach to passenger experience. \n\nThere is no universal definition of passenger experience, and the tools that exist to measure it (such as Skytrax, ACI's Airport Service Quality [ASQ] or IATA's Level of Service Concept) do not necessarily meet the needs of all airports. Research is needed to determine if there is more objective definition of what is the passenger experience should be, what must be done to deliver this experience, and how the airport can influence the passenger experience when customers are not at the airport (i.e. before the journey starts, or once the passenger boards the plane for example). \n\nIATA, individual air carriers, airports, and consultants all maintain standards and/or guidelines of spatial planning criteria for airport terminals as it relates to passenger experience. In IATA's 2014 10th edition of the Airport Development Manual, there were some significant changes to the categorization of level of service calculations from their 2004 (9th) edition. Similarly, many air carriers and fixed-base operators maintain guidelines to achieve their optimum level of passenger service which may vary substantially from other guidelines. Consultants and airports also maintain a wide range of passenger level of service  design guidelines that can be used to provide the \"optimum\" level of service. The multiple different design guidelines  relating to passenger and customer experience can be conflicting. Research is needed for the industry to validate and select the correct planning criteria guidelines for achieving the optimum level of service.","The objective of this research is to determine an objective definition of exceptional passenger experience and methods for delivering this experience and determining strategies for airports to influence the passenger experience beyond the confines of the airport itself (i.e. before the journey starts, or once the passenger boards the plane).  The research  will also identify how the aviation industry can standardize and validate planning criteria guidelines for achieving the optimum level of service provided to passengers and customers (i.e. business aviation). ","ACRP 01-26 \"Improving the Airport Customer Experience \" (2016)\n\nAirport Service Quality benchmarking program (ACI)\n\n","Administration, Airport Planning,  Customer Experience, Design, Marketing, Public Relations, Terminal"]
[37,15,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Sustainability and Resilience","Sustainable Design","Designing Resilient Infrastructure for an Uncertain Future:  When the 100 Year Storm Occurs Every 10 Years","Research is needed on changing precipitation and weather patterns, and providing guidance for airports on how to develop updated design guidelines taking climate change into account. A number of airports have developed updated design guidelines with new flooding maps taken into account for example. the research could also examine how airports can justify the expense of designing infrastructure to withstand storms that are based on outdated weather information, and demonstrate they are not \"over-designing\" for purposes of obtaining AIP grants.  ","Objective is to provide guidance for developing airport design guidelines that take climate change into account in the face of increased frequency of extreme weather events and changing weather patterns including strategies for justifying expenses related to resilient infrastructure.",null,"Airport Planning, Construction, Design, Environment, Finance-Economics, Policy   Sustainability"]
[9,17,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Finance and Revenue Development","Maximizing Concessions and Non-Aeronautical Revenue ","Research and case studies on retail design options for maximizing and diversifying revenue as well as campus-wide non-aeronautical revenue generation are needed. These could include a discussion of optimal locations of concessions, optimal co-location of certain types of concessions, aesthetic design components, alternatives to traditional airport concessions (i.e. integrating more experiential offerings instead of just food, beverage and retail),  and non-aeronautical redevelopment options.","The objective  of this research is to develop a guidebook and case studies on retail design options for maximizing and diversifying revenue, as well as campus-wide non-aeronautical revenue generation.","ACRP Report 54: Resource Manual for Airport In-Terminal Concessions\n\nACRP Report 33: Guidebook for Developing and Managing Airport Contracts\n\nACRP Synthesis 19: Airport Revenue Diversification (2010)","Airport Planning, Construction, Customer Experience, Design, Finance-Economics, Landside, Terminal"]
[29,18,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Safety and Security","Innovative Approaches to Security / TSA Operations","Airport Terminal Design for Protection during Active Shooter Events","Research to develop terminal design guidelines specifically for protection during an active-shooter or other terrorism event. This could include the design and construction of barriers or places where passengers and staff can hide / protect themselves from the security threat. this would include the pros and cons of such designs, for example consideration of how an active shooter could use such design features for their benefit. \n\n","Objective is to develop terminal design guidelines focusing on barriers or protection during an active-shooter or other terrorism event.","Similar to idea 18-Design \"Landside Soft Target Minimization \"\n\nPARAS 0011 - Guidance for Airport Security Master Planning\n\nPARAS 0013 - Managing Congestion in Public Areas to Mitigate Security Vulnerabilities","Design, Landside, Safety, Security, Terminal"]
[17,19,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies","Finance and Revenue Development","Airports and the Internet of Things (IoT): How Will New Technology and Business Models Impact the Revenue and Expense of Airports? ","Buildings and systems are growing more sophisticated and able to connect to the internet, each other, and feed information to the airport for a number of purposes. Research could build off of the ongoing development of a primer on this topic to understand how airpots can prepare for IoT during the design phase of construction or renovation projects. IoT networks  can help airports to achieve cost savings for operations and maintenance (for example by enabling more proactive maintenance before problems occur), enhance revenue from concessions, improve communications with airlines and more. ","The objective of this research is to develop guidance for airports to consider IoT networks and data utility during the design of new or renovated airport facilities. Information on how decisions made on the front end (in design) can also help the airport achieve cost savings in operations and maintenance later, enhance revenue from concessions, and improve communications.","ACRP 01-33 Preparing for the Connected Airport and the Internet of Things","Administration, Airport Planning , Finance-Economics, IT"]
[28,20,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Safety and Security","Integrating Technology, Data","Reducing Impediments for Remote Baggage Check-In","There is an opportunity to provide higher level customer service. Passengers without baggage create a higher level of security. Chain of custody issues would need to be examined. If there is a remote check-in and remote screening of bags then theoretically all bags introduced into the system will be secured, so it shouldn't matter who is checking it in.  Under the current scenario, baggage check needs to be completed with an ID check. Research is needed to determine if the technology is available to implement remote bag check with acceptable levels of security.  This project can also develop industry understanding of what the future of baggage check-in might look like with the adoption of biometrics.","Objective is to determine the feasibility of remote baggage check-in and screening, and if feasible how airports might being to implement.",null,"Customer Experience, Design, Landside, safety, Security, Terminal"]
[32,20,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Safety and Security","Innovative Approaches to Security / TSA Operations","Implementation of Access Control in Cargo Facilities","Those seeking to create harm and disruption in our nation's air travel system are constantly trying to access critical infrastructure, especially airports. Airport cargo facilities could be vulnerable to breaches, as often the facility operator is responsible for securing the premises and standards are not uniformly stringent. Research is needed to examine procedures, technologies, processes and practices for better securing access to cargo facilities to only authorized users.","Objective is to examine procedures, technologies, processes and practices for better securing access to airport cargo facilities to only authorized users.",null,"Airside, Construction, Design, IT, Security"]
[3,22,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Passenger Experience","Guidebook for Aviation Symbol System ","Research is needed to develop a universal Aviation Symbol and Nomenclature System for the airport/travel sector that is comprehensive, rigorously tested, and industry accepted. This should include guidelines for their best use in airports. The focus will be campus-wide wayfinding. Process should be based on a global approach with U.S. airport application.\n\nThe objective is to produce an aviation symbol library and report that can provide:\n \n- Consistent application of a symbol system with high comprehension to travelers.\n- Practical Solutions to problems faced every day by airport operators.\n- Bridge Communication Language Barriers for non-English speaking travelers.\n- Royalty-free Resource materials that exist in the public domain.\n- Non-Mandatory, Up-to-date Reference Work with the potential to inform future, as well as current sign implementations. \n- Simple, Low-cost Documentation and high-resolution source material/artwork for accurate reproduction & easy dissemination. \n- Standards & Protocols for ongoing R&D to meet rapidly evolving airport technologies & needs.\n- Encourage & Commerce Contact between airports, agencies, companies, designers, & sign-makers to address needs as they arise in a more timely manner.","The objective is to produce a universal aviation symbol and nomenclature library and corresponding guidelines for implementation.","ACRP Report 52: Wayfinding and Signing Guidelines for Airport Terminals and Landside\n\n\nReport 177: Enhancing Airport Wayfinding for Aging Travelers and Persons with Disabilities","Customer Experience, Design, Public safety, Operations, Safety"]
[16,22,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies","Modernizing and Retrofitting Airport Buildings","Passive to Active Monitoring Space: How to Retrofit for Smart Buildings and Systems","Building and asset management systems are not new, but new technologies are becoming available to better monitor assets, components, systems, energy use, etc. Research is needed to understand how these new monitoring and sensing technologies can be incorporated into older buildings.  In particular, information on available technologies, which technologies are best suited to particular airport facilities, and how airports can integrate them with existing IT systems would be helpful. Case studies that demonstrate any savings  from undertaking retrofits of buildings to incorporate new management systems and sensing technologies would also be valuable.  ","The objective is to determine how airport facilities can be retrofitted to integrate new monitoring and sensing technologies into existing IT systems or through building and asset management systems, including information to help airports select which smart technologies are most appropriate for their facilities. In addition, information on savings that can be associated with building retrofits would be useful. This idea could be a stand-alone project or combined with the \"Plug and Play\" research idea on retrofitting older facilities.",null,"Airport Planning, Construction, Design , IT, Sustainability, Terminal"]
[2,24,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Integrating Technology, Data","Designing for Data – The Foundation for Customer Service","As evidenced by recent ACI-NA and ACC studies on industry trends, a current focus of the airport industry is on improving customer service, facilitation and passenger experience. In today's highly connected world, the ability to personalize each passenger travel experience through their smart device is technologically feasible. However, research is needed to determine exactly what data is available, what can be used to determine passengers’ needs and preferences, and how that data can be employed to improve the way passengers interact with the airport and airline(s). \nToday we have beacon technology that allows us to pinpoint activity through Bluetooth signals given off from passengers smart devices.  Coupled with NFC (near field communication) such as Apple Pay transactions, data can be gathered without significant investment in setting up a device.  While certain data on passengers and their preferences is seemingly easy to get, combining the data from a passenger's experience along the entire travel experience is more difficult.  \n\nThere are multiple application developers taking bits of this data and creating apps that give some customized service to passengers, but it would appear that there is still an opportunity to combine the complete customer experience into the cloud, which would allow the customer to have an individualized experience regardless of the airport they are using. There is an opportunity for this data to be used to design better airport facilities as well. \n\nCentral to this effort may be determining how passenger name record (PNR) data, owned and held by the individual air carriers, can be utilized without exposing personal and proprietary data central to the passenger and the airline.  Research could investigate the available passenger data, and how it can be securely used to both design better airports and provide more customized experience (ex. concessions) to passengers?  If not, what data is needed and how can airports procure it to create a better customer service experience?","The objective is to determine data availability for improving and tailoring customer service, facilitation and experience. This research would provide information on how airports can best utilize customer data to improve facility design and interaction between airport, airlines, and customer, while maintaining a high level of security.  ","ACRP Report 140: Guidebook on Best Practices for Airport Cybersecurity","Administration, Airport Planning, Customer Experience, Design, IT"]
[40,24,null,"General Design and Construction","Construction Best Practices, Guidance and Tools","Best Practices for Developing AIrport Construction After Action Reports ","Airport construction projects of all sizes take considerable planning and preparation. Once a project is complete there are varying levels of effort made to capture valuable lessons learned to aide in future project planning. Airports that have developed \"after action\" reports can use that as a resource on future projects to improve the overall process and educate new employees. Research is needed to develop best practices for the development of airport construction project \"after action\" reports.","Develop a synthesis of practices from both within and without the airport industry on after action reports for construction projects. The research can include information on how to develop these reports, key elements and how they are used for example. ",null,"Administration,  Construction, Policy"]
[19,26,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies","Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS/Drones)","Airfield Design Guidelines for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles","Current standards for airport design are mainly based on collision and excursion risk models developed for manned aircraft, and it is unclear if UAVs are following the same rules. Questions remain for the airport industry regarding the standards and needs of aviation facilities designed for UAV use, for example if such facilities should be based on the same acceptable levels of risk for manned aircraft. UAV landing and takeoff requirements may be different than manned aircraft as well. Most of the UAVs are smaller sizes than conventional manned aircraft, and the amount of g-force that is suitable for the unmanned aircraft can be much higher than the manned aircraft. Based on the precision of their trajectory during the approach and takeoff, does an UAV need the same runway protections such as Runway Safety Area (RSA), Runway Object Free Area (ROFA), Runway Protection Zones (RPZ), and Object Free Zones (OFZ) as defined for conventional aircraft? There are  similar questions with regards to taxiways, for exmaple: taxiway widths, taxiway-object and taxiway-runway separation distances. Small UAS (sUAS) - that can be launched and recovered from non-prepared fields might not require the same approach of large UAS that have needs close to those of manned aircraft. Both fixed and rotor wing should be taken into focus. Similarly, infrastructure should be set up for the both platforms, such as runways for take off of fixed wing UAS, and landing zones for rotor wing UAS. ","The objective of this research is to develop a guidebook for designing airfield infrastructure and facilities to safely and efficiently meet the unique  operational requirements of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) of various sizes and configurations.  ","ACRP Report 144: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) at Airports: A Primer (2015)\n\nFAA ASSURE Center of Excellence for UAS research, some projects funded to research communications technology, airworthiness of UAS, collision avoidance, etc. but not airfield design guidelines","Airport-Planning, Airside, Construction, Design, General Aviation, Legla, Operations, Safety, Public Safety, Security"]
[30,27,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Safety and Security","Innovative Approaches to Security / TSA Operations","Business Case for a Consolidated Distribution Facility: A Centralized Trucking Facility to Streamline Security in Landside and Airside Supply Delivery","There are numerous benefits to the construction of consolidated distribution facilities at airports, including safety, security, environmental, and operational efficiency. Research is needed to develop the business case and produce case studies of how centralized trucking facilities can streamline security for both landside and airside supply delivery. Having a consolidated receiving center cuts down on the number of people that need access to secure spaces, removes vehicles from other parts of the airport, and offers a more controlled environment for inspections. ","Objective is to develop a compendium of business case studies to determine how to best construct and implement consolidated distribution facilities to allow for streamlined security on both landside and airside supply delivery. the case studies would examine costs and benefits as well as key considerations for airports as they decide whether to develop a centralized distribution facility.",null,"Airport Planning, Airside, Design, Finance-Economics, Operations, Safety, Security"]
[26,28,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","General Guidance / Implementation Tools","Consistent Planning of Complex Construction Projects: Guidance and Best Practices ","This ideas was outlined in the RTCA TOC Report to the FAA from 2016 on improving airport construction practices. The report notes that while the industry has been \"moving in a positive direction in terms of collaboration among the different stakeholders in planning such complex projects...there is still no comprehensive guidance on how to execute complex construction planning in a consistent and repeatable format\". \n\nThere does exist some guidance from FAA Orders and Advisory Circulars they are not complete and focus on safety. There is a need for research to develop more comprehensive planning and phasing guidelines, to include at a minimum, the definition of necessary participants and their roles in construction planning and safety phasing plans. ","Objective is to develop comprehensive planning and phasing guidance, to include at a minimum, the definition of necessary participants and their roles in construction planning.","ACRP 08-02 \"Integrating Collaborative Partnering for AIrport Projects\" (2018)","Airport Planning, Construction, Design, Human Resources, Workforce"]
[11,29,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","General Design and Construction","Construction Best Practices, Guidance and Tools","Improving Awareness of Airport Construction Projects: Construction Clearinghouse","The idea for an airport construction clearinghouse came from RTCA's Tactical Operations Committee Report in 2016, titled \"Improving Awareness, Planning and Execution of Airport Construction\". According to the report, there is a need for \"standardization related to construction planning and notification\". The report identified a construction clearinghouse as one solution. Essentially the clearinghouse would be an online web resource accessible to various airport and airline operator stakeholders.  The need was identified primarily for airports outside of the \"core 30\" (largest) airports, i.e. the small to medium airports.  The clearinghouse would serve as a database for all planned construction projects that could impact airline operators, and would send an alert out to users when a project is entered so affected stakeholders can engage with the airport to learn more about the project.\n\n","Objective is to develop an airport construction clearinghouse to allow for standardized construction planning and notification through an online web database containing all planned construction projects.",null,"Administration, Airport-Planning, Construction, Design, Finance-Economics, IT"]
[15,30,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies","Curbside, Roadways, Vehicles","Infrastructure for Autonomous Vehicles\n","As autonomous vehicles arrive at the airport, on both the landside and airside, airports will need to understand their operations, what infrastructure and technology is needed to enhance the effectiveness and ensure the safety of autonomous vehicles, and how to quantify the benefits.  Research is needed to prepare airports for the upcoming technology, how it is likely to be deployed at the airport, how it will integrate with existing airport infrastructure and technologies and what safety and / or environmental and customer service benefits can be achieved. ","Objective is to provide information on the impending use of autonomous vehicles on both the landside and airside at airports, including infrastructure considerations, methods for integrating new technology into existing IT systems, strategies to ensure effective and safe autonomous vehicle systems, and methods for deployment as well as quantifying environmental and customer service benefits. ","current ACRP project looking at these issues for airside. 02-82","Airside, Airport Planning, Design, Landside, IT, Operations, Safety, Sustainability,  "]
[39,30,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Workforce Development","Integrating Technology, Data","Integrating Advanced Digital Technologies into Staff Development Programs","With the increased adoption of advanced technologies in the airport environment, from building automation, to modeling systems, connected system components, autonomous vehicles, etc., airport personnel need to be trained to effectively use the technology and understand its capabilities in order to gain the most benefit from investment. Research is needed to produce training materials for airport staff that are not information technology experts in how to use a range of technologies. ","Objective is to produce training guidance for integrating advanced digital technology training into staff development programs. ","ACRP Report 75: Airport Leadership Development Program (2012)","Administration, Hu man Resources, IT, Workforce"]
[10,32,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","General Design and Construction","Finance and Revenue Development","Costs and Consequences of Procurement Delays ","Delays in contracting and procurement are not unique to the airport industry, and are unfortunately common and sometimes viewed as \"business as usual\". However delays in procurement can have significant impacts on project budgets and timelines. The full consequences of procurement delays are not well understood and as a result there has not been sufficient attention paid to solving the underlying causes of delays to prevent them in the first place. Research is needed to develop the cost estimates and range of consequences for delays, and guidance for how airports can put a dollar figure on the impact of the delays, and support efforts to reduce or eliminate them. \n\nLack of awareness across airport industry on this subject and local governments to understand the impacts of procurement delays, and a quantification of these problems would be useful for keeping on schedule and budget. The research would have multiple objectives depending on the audience (i.e. airport executives, staff, local government, etc.)","The objective is to show cost impacts and the range of consequences for contracting and procurement delays, provide guidance for airports to quantify the impact of the delays in terms of cost, and strategies for reducing or eliminating delays. The research would have multiple objectives depending on the audience (i.e. airport executives, staff, local government, etc.)","ACRP Legal Digest 16 \"Procurement of Airport Development and Planning Contracts\". this legal digest provides an overview of contract requirements and grant assurances. subsequent research could build off this as the \"primer\" language. ","Administration, Airport-Planning, Construction, Finance-Economics, Legal"]
[6,33,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Passenger Experience","How Airports Can Influence the Entire “Customer Experience\" from Start to Finish","The customer or passenger experience has become a metric in how we look at and design airport terminals in the U.S. today.  There are questions as to how to objectively apply this metric, both from terminal to terminal and from airport to airport, however only a small percentage of travelers' journeys take place at the airport. The \"passenger experience\" is influenced starting at the time of ticket purchase, continues with the journey to and through the departure airport, arriving at the destination airport and finally exiting the airport. The question then remains, how much of this experience does the airport really own and influence? Some airlines may view the passengers as primarily their customers, and not the airport's as if there were no airline service to terminal facilities, there would be no passengers to measure customer service. Conversely, if there were no airports the airlines could never land or take off. Its reasonable therefore to understand the customer experience as jointly owned by both airlines and airports (at a minimum), and customer service is best delivered through a collaborative effort by both. This research project would seek to understand how airlines and airports collaborate to create best in class customer experience around the world, and identify those areas and initiatives where airports can make the greatest difference. ","This research project would provide guidance on how airlines and airports can collaborate to create best in class customer experience, and identify those areas and initiatives where airports can make the greatest difference.  ","ACRP 01-26 \"Improving the Airport Customer Experience \" (2016)\n\nAirport Service Quality benchmarking program (ACI)\n\n","Administration, Airport Planning,  Customer Experience, Design, Marketing, Terminal"]
[36,34,"Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Sustainability and Resilience","Construction Materials","Subsurface Drainage System Benefits in Airport Pavement Performance","This research would summarize the best of practices through survey of airports and consultants; evaluate the effectiveness of subsurface drainage configurations by investigating field performance of airport pavements with and without drainage features; quantify the cost and benefits of including subsurface drainage by comparing any potential extension in service-life with increased construction and maintenance costs; and formulate recommendations of subsurface material properties and the FAARFIELD implementation","Objective is to synthesize best practices and evaluate the effectiveness and benefits of subsurface drainage systems for airport pavement including cost-benefit analysis. ",null,"Airport Planning, Construction, Design, Environment, Finance-Economics,  Sustainability, Water Quality"]
[35,35,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Sustainability and Resilience","Finance and Revenue Development","The Costs and Benefits of Designing for Net Zero Energy","Some airports are setting goals for new facilities to be \"net zero\" energy - that is the average annual energy consumption for the building to operate is equal to the amount of energy produced on site (or in some definitions, renewable energy produced offsite but 'owned' by the airport). This is an emerging practice area and there are few examples in the airport industry to look to for best practices and cost estimates. Organizations like the International Living Futures Institute have developed certification standards for \"net zero\" energy buildings and overall net zero buildings (Living Building Challenge), but the majority of projects seem to be smaller commercial /office buildings and residential, rather than large infrastructure facilities like airports. This research project would look to examples in other industries and facilities that have similar characteristics to airport buildings and provide an overview of the level of effort, design techniques, trade-offs, cost benefit analysis required to achieve net zero energy.  ","Objective is to determine best practices and cost estimates for airport facilities to achieve net zero energy, including an overview of the level of effort, design techniques, trade-offs, and cost benefit analysis.  ",null,"Airport Planning, Construction, Design, Environment, Finance-Economics, IT, Policy, Sustainability"]
[24,36,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","Integrating Technology, Data","Applying Dynamic Network Analysis to Improve Collaboration on Airport Construction Projects","Guidance on how the airport industry can employ new technologies and techniques used in other industries to provide real-time feedback on communication networks and collaboration (who is communicating with whom, about what, how often) in construction projects during delivery. The data can be used to determine if the right stakeholders are involved in decision making to meet project/organizational goals, and if not what corrections are needed. The ultimate objective of employing this type of technology and technique is to enhance collaboration to better meet project / organizational goals, timelines, budgets etc. and work more effectively across divisions.  \n\nAirports are complex environments. Everything from large construction projects to day-to-day operations requires the cooperation from multiple different departments, and often both internal and external (consultant) staff.  Airports, like many other industries, are often organized based on outdated models and siloes, and are not integrated to maximize performance in the current operating environment. Research is needed on existing and emerging technologies that can better foster cross-departmental and organizational communication and collaboration. Social network analysis and artificial intelligence are currently being used in other industries to achieve similar goals and could be employed at airports, particularly in construction projects, starting from early planning and design stages in project delivery.  This research could give guidance to team members on interactions, including drawing network maps based on interactions between team members. The data provided is real time and can be used predict team communication patterns before they occur. This data can be used to make course corrections as needed, and improve communication and team interaction.","Guidance on how the airport industry can employ new technologies and techniques used in other industries to provide real-time feedback on communication networks and collaboration in construction projects during delivery to enhance collaboration and better meet project / organizational goals, timelines, budgets etc. and work more effectively across divisions.  The research can also examine the safety and security benefits of network analysis  (for example, who has access to a construction site).","ACRP 08-02 Integrating Collaborative Partnering for Airport Projects; ACRP Report 137: Guidebook for Advancing Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) at A","Administration, Construction,  Design, IT"]
[5,37,"Customer Service and Travel Experience","Customer Service","Passenger Experience","Creating a Sense of Place with Local Concessions","Airport concessions offerings have come a long way since the days when a handful of companies monopolized this sector of the industry. In the late 1980's and 1990's the industry saw the development within airports that mimicked shopping malls, offering a plethora of shopping, food and beverage opportunities, for airport passengers and  meeters/greeters alike.  After 9/11 a fairly significant amount of foot traffic declined on the airside due to new security constraints. This had a negative impact on airside concessions, and landside concessions have in many instances disappeared. \n\nNow the industry is finding new ways to increase concessions revenue, including a new trend towards more local businesses, international products, or designs that direct 100% of passenger foot traffic through a  concessions area. In addition, airports are beginning to incorporate concessions that offer experiential offerings (such as spas or gyms) as opposed to just food, beverage and retail offerings.  To combat a common public perception that all airport concessions are the same, to create a higher level of service and to win passengers who have a choice of airports, airports are working to create a \"sense of place\" with their concession offerings. Buzz words aside, ACRP research could be useful in helping airports to understand what this concept means, and how they can successfully deploy it, including addressing how airports can assess the proper mix of national brands, that all will expect to see, with local flavor in a way that maximizes passenger participation and airport revenue.  ","Objective is to enable airports to find new ways to increase concessions revenue by developing and incorporating a \"sense of place\" into their design.  The research should address strategies for airports to assess their ideal mix of concession and service types, national brands and local flavor in a way that maximizes passenger participation and airport revenue.",null,"Airport Planning, Construction, Customer Experience, Design, Terminal"]
[12,38,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","General Design and Construction","Construction Materials","Guidebook on the Selection, Application and Tracking of Building Materials for AIrport Construction Projects","To create a comprehensive resource for architects, interior designers, engineers, builders and airport operators to help them in selection of materials for new construction or renovation of existing facilities. The research will also examine and evaluate tracking technologies for materials. The guidebook should also provide information to airport operators and designers on how to evaluate life cycle cost implications of selecting different building materials.","Objective is to create a comprehensive resource for selecting new construction/renovation materials for airport facilities, including utilization of tracking technology for materials and evaluation of life cycle cost implications of various materials. ","ACRP Report 172: Guidebook for Considering Life-Cycle Costs in Airport Asset Procurement ","Construction, Design, Finance-Economics, Maintenance, Sustainability, Terminal"]
[34,38,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Sustainability and Resilience","Sustainable Design","Net Zero Greenfield versus Net Zero Brownfield – What Really is Possible?","Advances in technology and materials has allowed what was once considered impossible to be possible - the development of \"Net Zero Energy\" buildings. Net Zero energy buildings consume less energy than they create on an average annual basis.  Some airports, notably SFO are trying to develop net zero facilities for certain buildings, but are starting with new construction.  Research is needed to better understand what is possible with technology and materials  available for achieving net zero for both new buildings and existing facilities. ","Objective is to develop guidance on the implementation and application of technology and materials available for achieving net zero energy for both new buildings and existing facilities. This guidance should take into account state and local regulations and limitations.","SAGA Database; ACRP Report 42: Sustainable Airport Construction Practices; ACRP Report 80: Guidebook for Incorporating Sustainability into Traditional Airport Projects; ACRP Synthesis 66: Lessons Learned from Airport Sustainability Plans; ACRP Synthesis Report 77 - Airport Sustainability Practices\n\n02-82: How to achieve net-zero roadmap for airports ACRP project is just getting started","Airport Planning, Construction, Design, Environment, Finance-Economics, IT, Policy, Sustainability"]
[33,40,"Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Sustainability and Resilience","Sustainable Design","Selecting and Implementing the Right Certification or Rating System ","Existing sustainability rating and certification systems are constantly being updated (LEED for campus / multiple buildings. EPA Energy Star) and newer sustainability rating systems  are emerging (Envision, PEER, WELL). States often have their  own guidance and requirements as well. Guidance is needed for airports to determine which rating or certification system, if any, is right for their project / facility.","Objective is to produce guidance for selecting and implementing the most applicable sustainability certification or rating system for airport projects / facilities.","SAGA Database; ACRP Report 42: Sustainable Airport Construction Practices; ACRP Report 80: Guidebook for Incorporating Sustainability into Traditional Airport Projects; ACRP Synthesis 66: Lessons Learned from Airport Sustainability Plans; ACRP Synthesis Report 77 - Airport Sustainability Practices","Airport Planning, Construction, Design, Policy, Sustainability, Terminal"]

{"sheet":"Validation lists","index":1,"n_rows":31,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":31,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Design/ Construction","High Level Theme",null,"Subtopc","Source","ACRP IdeaHub Tags"]
["Construction","Customer Service","Customer Service and Travel Experience","Accommodating Changing Demographics","IdeaHub","Administration"]
["Design","Project Management, Delivery & Financing Models","Safe and Secure Air Transportation System","Alternative Approaches to Project Delivery Mechanisms","Research","Airport-Planning"]
["Both","General Design and Construction","Capacity, Growth and Efficiency","Construction Best Practices, Guidance and Tools","Interview","Air-Quality"]
[null,"Sustainability and Resiliency",null,"Construction Materials","Webinar","Air-Service"]
[null,"Integrating Advanced and Disruptive Technologies",null,"Curbside, Roadways, Vehicles","Other","Airside"]
[null,"Safety and Security",null,"Finance and Revenue Development",null,"Construction"]
[null,"Workforce Development",null,"General Guidance / Implementation Tools",null,"Customer-Experience"]
[null,null,null,"Innovative Approaches to Security / TSA Operations",null,"Design"]
[null,null,null,"Integrating Technology, Data",null,"Emergency-Management"]
[null,null,null,"Modernizing and Retrofitting Airport Buildings",null,"Environment"]
[null,null,null,"Passenger Experience",null,"Finance-Economics"]
[null,null,null,"Sustainable Design",null,"General-Aviation"]
[null,null,null,"Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS/Drones)",null,"Human-Resources"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Information-Technology"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Landside"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Legal"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Maintenance"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Marketing"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Noise-Impacts"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Operations"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Policy"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Public-Relations"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Public-Safety"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Safety"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Security"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Sustainability"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Synthesis"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Terminal"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Water-Quality"]
[null,null,null,null,null,"Workforce"]